If you are an independent or small press publisher and would like to submit your books for consideration to” Recommended Reads,” click here.
Crossing the Rubicon
The American Reichstag
When Leslie Left
Not Guilty Every Time
Rebirth of a Realist
Caso English to Italian Dictionary
The Freedom Stairs
The Joy Ladder
Samuel’s Sugar Baby
When the Cold Maker Comes
Singing an Epic of Peace
Take the Money and Shove It!
By J. F. Miglio
Probably the second worst Supreme Court decision in the last 30 years– we all know the worst– was the 1976 Buckley v. Valeo decision that equated freedom of speech with paid political advertising.
At the time, the Supreme Court was not as conservative as it is today; nevertheless, it rendered a judgment that sanctified the process for political candidates to package and sell themselves to the American public like Coca Cola or Pepsodent toothpaste– a great victory for Big Business in the Land of the Free and a historic reminder of how easily the Supreme Court could be bought by corporate interests to undermine the Constitution and the democratic process.
The judges in favor of the decision argued that paid political advertising was protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution that guaranteed freedom of speech. In other words, staging, shooting, and paying for an ad about a political candidate on television or radio, or in newspapers and magazines, was somehow equivalent to American citizens having the freedom to express their political or religious views in a public forum without getting persecuted or thrown into jail.
If Thomas Jefferson were alive today, not only would he be appalled by the 1976 decision, but he would be the first to point out how the decision, in effect, laid the groundwork for our election process to be usurped by special interest groups and corporate money, rendering the process not only antithetical to free speech, but also making it nearly impossible for Third Party candidates to run successfully for public office.
If you are not familiar with the Buckley v. Valeo decision, or have not read the numerous articles and essays about it, don’t feel left out. The mainstream media never mention it, other than to state– as if it’s a priori knowledge– that paid political advertising is equivalent to free speech and protected by the Constitution.
Naturally they would say that, since the five megacorporations that own a majority of the mass media in the country today, including all the major television networks and cable stations, and most of the major newspapers and magazines, have reaped billions of dollars of profits in the last few decades from paid political advertising. Which is also why they have no qualms about running political ads they know are either false or deceptive, like the Swift Boat ads used against John Kerry.
God forbid they should apply some ethical standards and say, “Now hold on, fellas! We can’t run ads that are deliberately false or misleading– no matter how much money is involved. After all, we have an obligation to the American people to present the truth.”
Fat chance! Instead they hide behind the corporate rubric so nicely formulated during the Reagan years: Corporations are in business to make money– fuck ethics and social responsibility!
In 2002 the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law made an effort to at least take “soft money” away from political parties and make the election process fairer, but unfortunately, it left a loophole large enough for a big rig truck to drive through by allowing 527 groups (like the Swift Boat Boys or Moveon.org) to spend as much soft money as they want on advertising for their favorite politicians.
Which proves that when it comes to campaign finance reform, trimming around the edges or advocating incrementalism doesn’t work, and the only way to make the election process truly fair and democratic is to take money out of the system altogether. How can this be done?
Three easy steps: 1) Support an amendment to the Constitution to repeal the Buckley v. Valeo decision. 2) Outlaw all paid political advertising in any election– from city to state to federal. 3) Give every serious candidate for office the same amount of free public airtime and news media coverage.
If you are a traditional publishing house and would like to submit your books for consideration to “Recommended Reads,” click here.
Chain of Command
How the Department of Defense mishandled the disaster at Abu Ghraib.…Read Review
Crimes Against Nature
How the Bush administration policies have gutted America’s environment.…Read Review
Running on Empty
How the Republican and Democratic parties are bankrupting the country, and what we can do about it.…Read Review
What Would Jefferson Do?
Examines what Jefferson and our Founding Fathers would do about America’s loss of civil liberty and freedom.…Read Review
What’s the Matter with Kansas?
How conservatives won the hearts and minds of America, and why Americans vote against their own self-interest. …Read Review
Explores democratic tradition, “from the radical iconoclasm of Socrates, to the tragically schizophrenic visions of the American Founding Fathers, to the exuberant and brilliant indictments laid down by hip-hop.”…Read Review
History of American secret operations from Hitler to Al Quaeda, including new analysis about the war on terrorism and Iraq.…Read Review
Premiere investigative journalists explain how health care in America became Big Business and bad medicine.…Read Review
Revealing look at how the Republican and Democratic parties control and manipulate the presidential debates.…Read Review
Humorous account of how conservatives in America are still angry, even though they are in power.…Read Review
The Last Days of Socrates
The original guru of Western Civilization offers his final words of wisdom on truth and goodness.…Read About
The world’s most famous study of power politics.…Read About
The Manchurian Candidate
The original thriller about brainwashing and political intrigue.…Read About